<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Manilablog.com &#187; Manila Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manilablog.com/category/manila-opinions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manilablog.com</link>
	<description>A Bisayan's Photo and Living Adventure in Metro Manila</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bayani Fernando&#8217;s Controversial Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.manilablog.com/bayani-fernandos-controversial-poster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manilablog.com/bayani-fernandos-controversial-poster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manilaboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Manila News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manila Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manila Photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manilablog.com/bayani-fernandos-controversial-poster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This controversial poster with Bayani Fernando&#8217;s image on it has caused stir among politicians in Metro Manila.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This controversial poster with Bayani Fernando&#8217;s image on it has caused stir among politicians in Metro Manila.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2191/2420793480_de1d272e1d.jpg?v=0" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manilablog.com/bayani-fernandos-controversial-poster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manila Universities are Overhyped!</title>
		<link>http://www.manilablog.com/manila-universities-are-overhyped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manilablog.com/manila-universities-are-overhyped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manilaboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Manila Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manilablog.com/manila-universities-are-overhyped/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, Manila universities are grossly overhyped as i have written previously.In the recently published result of the Architecture board exam, UST, a school in Manila got three topnotchers, while the provincial school USC got two topnotchers (top 2 and 4).
Hey UST has 3, and USC has only 2?!
Well, i&#8217;m not finished yet.
USC (Univ. of San [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Manila universities are grossly overhyped as i have <a href="http://gwapito.com/manila-universities-and-the-provincial-universities-and-colleges/" target="_blank">written</a> previously.In the recently published result of the Architecture board exam, UST, a school in Manila got <strong>three </strong>topnotchers, while the provincial school <a href="http://www.usc.edu.ph" target="_blank">USC</a> got <strong>two</strong> topnotchers (top 2 and 4).</p>
<p>Hey UST has 3, and USC has only 2?!</p>
<p>Well, i&#8217;m not finished yet.</p>
<p>USC (Univ. of San Carlos) &#8211; 68% (13/19) 13 passed out of 19 takers<br />
UST &#8211; 56% (35/63) 35 passed out of 63 takers</p>
<p>USC even with few exam takers it still able to have two topnotchers. In numbers that&#8217;s 11% excellent students for USC, while UST has only 5% excellent ones.</p>
<p>Just got lucky?!</p>
<p>Nope.</p>
<p>On our Architect&#8217;s board last 2006, USC had 2 topnotchers, I think UST got 3. USC had 13 passers out of 26, UST had 57 passers out of 144 takers, that&#8217;s 50%.</p>
<p><strong>USC with fewer students produced more academically good graduates</strong>.</p>
<p>Let me show you the nursing exam results this year (2008). Just the passing percentage.</p>
<p>A. WITH <strong>100 AND MORE</strong> EXAMINEES<br />
1 Saint Louis University (Baguio) 146/144 99.00 %<br />
2 Xavier University (Cagayan de Oro) 233/229 98.00 %<br />
3 Silliman University (Dumaguete) 321/312 97.00 %<br />
NOTHING FOLLOWS&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong><br />
</strong>B. WITH <strong>30-99 </strong>EXAMINEES<br />
1 Trinity University of Asia (Trinity â€“ Quezon City, that&#8217;s Manila) 41 40 98.00 %<br />
2 Mindanao State University ( Marawi City) 76 74 97.00 %<br />
University of the East Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center (another Manila, thankfully) 31 30 97.00 %<br />
3 Palawan State University (P. Princesa) 57 54 95.00 %<br />
NOTHING FOLLOWS&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Where is the much overhyped UST in the list? UST is way down the list with 75% rate.</p>
<p>Ateneo and De Lasalle probably don&#8217;t have architecture and nursing courses.</p>
<p>I have nothing against Manila schools. I just like to encourage those students and graduates from Philippine provincial universities that we &#8220;promdis&#8221; are clearly at par if not better.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<em><a href="http://gwapito.com/manila-universities-are-overhyped/" target="_blank">Original post taken</a> from my <a href="http://www.gwapito.com" target="_blank">personal blog</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manilablog.com/manila-universities-are-overhyped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
